
This 12 months’s elk season is a historic one in Colorado. It’s the primary time in additional than 80 years that big-game hunters have shared the panorama with a longtime inhabitants of grey wolves. That is because of an ongoing wolf reintroduction plan that was voted in by a slim majority of Coloradans in 2020 and has rankled hunters and outfitters, who are actually fearful in regards to the impacts these wolves could have on the state’s world-famous elk herds.
Their considerations are warranted. Colorado is dwelling to extra elk than another U.S. state, and it’s far-and-away the preferred elk-hunting vacation spot for nonresidents. A staggering 186,028 individuals hunted elk in Colorado in 2023 in comparison with 52,951 in Wyoming and 87,864 in Idaho. However all this searching stress (from each residents and non-residents) is mounting, and as hunters complain about overcrowded public-land items, the state is cutting back on out-of-state elk tags. Continued improvement and land-use modifications, together with the unfold of continual losing illness, are impacting Colorado’s elk herds as properly.
Wolves not solely compound these considerations. They embody them. And as hunters in different Western states share stories about wolves taking a bite out of their big-game herds, a few of them are beginning to view wolf reintroduction campaigns as a solution to eradicate or limit searching altogether.
Prefer it or not, although, grey wolves are right here to remain within the Centennial State. Colorado Parks and Wildlife has no selection however to observe its mandate to revive a sustainable inhabitants of wolves to Western Colorado — a course of that started in December when CPW officers released the first of 10 Oregon-born wolves into Grand and Summit counties. CPW is now planning its next release for this coming winter, utilizing wolves sourced from Canada. There’s additionally proof that wolves have been returning to Colorado on their very own since 2004.
Learn Subsequent: Coloradans Vote Down a Big Cat Hunting Ban in a Massive Win for Hunters and Conservationists
As of Nov. 5, CPW is monitoring 9 wolves within the wild. And though this isn’t sufficient to noticeably affect big-game species like elk, it’s solely a matter of time. Specialists know that wolves will reestablish a viable inhabitants in Colorado as a result of we’ve seen them do exactly that in different Western states like Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana, the place they had been both reintroduced or recovered on their very own. (Wolf biologists in Idaho and Montana say it solely took about 10 years for grey wolves to reestablish themselves there.) So, by wanting carefully at how wolf restoration has performed out in these Northern Rockies states — and the way elk herds have fared — a tough thought of what to anticipate in Colorado emerges.
Wolves, after all, are unpredictable, and Colorado is totally different in some ways from different Western states. It can be laborious to get straight solutions about grey wolves as a result of they belong to such a controversial species that generates robust feelings. As with different wildlife administration controversies, one of the simplest ways to chop by way of this noise is to observe the science. So, drawing on a long time of traits and analysis round wolves and elk within the West, listed below are 5 conclusions hunters can moderately draw about what wolves will do to Colorado’s elk.
Wolves Will Change Elk Habits

Picture by Jillian / Adobe Inventory
Wyoming clothing store Invoice Perry has been guiding elk hunters on the outer fringes of Yellowstone Nationwide Park for the reason that Eighties. And he’ll inform you that the searching alternatives there have modified since wolves returned to the panorama.
“Earlier than [the Wyoming wolf reintroduction] the searching was actually good, and it nonetheless is. The elk have discovered to reside with them, and in response to Sport and Fish, our elk numbers are above goal,” says Perry, who primarily hunts Unit 60 on the southeast nook of Yellowstone Nationwide Park. “However now, searching them it’s an entire totally different factor. The bulls was extra vocal, and they’d be down within the creek bottoms the place you can bugle and get to them. Now they’re simply as excessive as they will go, and the wolves have pushed a few of them out of the mountains fully. Now we have elk now within the plains south of Cody, an space that by no means used to have any elk on it.”
Perry says this transformation has led to a lack of searching alternatives for some hunters who can’t entry these areas. He provides that the pattern has been much more evident in Montana and Idaho, each of which have considerably extra wolves than Wyoming. (The newest estimates present that Wyoming is dwelling to round 350 wolves, whereas Idaho and Montana have greater than 1,000.)
“The fellows I do know, particularly in Montana,” Perry provides, “they’re gonna inform you that the numbers of elk they’re seeing are down.”
Wolves Gained’t Eat All of Colorado’s Elk
Biologists with the Wyoming Sport and Fish Division warning towards routinely linking wolves and declining elk numbers in anyone location, nonetheless. Wolf predation can definitely play a task in decreasing elk numbers, they are saying. However so do different issues like hunter harvest, habitat loss, winter kill, illness, and in some locations, different predators like bears and mountain lions.
“I all the time use the phrase ‘potential’ as a result of it’s not a given,” WGFD wolf biologist Ken Mills explains. “It’s not A plus B equals C the place you’ve gotten wolves and you’ve got elk, and due to this fact wolves are going to scale back elk numbers. It’s not that straightforward.”
Wanting north to Wyoming can be complicated as a result of the state’s total elk numbers have really elevated for the reason that mid Nineteen Nineties, when wolves had been reintroduced to Yellowstone Nationwide Park. The identical goes for the annual statewide elk harvest, in response to Dr. Kevin Crooks, who runs the Center for Human-Carnivore Coexistence at Colorado State College. He says that is proof that Coloradans can have each wolves and large recreation on the panorama.

Picture by A. Falgoust / NPS
“Colorado has a strong elk herd, greater than another state — the latest estimates are simply over 300,000 [animals]. And it’s unlikely that wolf predation will considerably lower the entire variety of elk throughout all the state,” says Crooks. However he provides that in some conditions, wolves might need native impacts on some elk herds, significantly throughout harsh winters or instances of drought.
“Wolves can even change what elk do and the place elk transfer,” Crooks acknowledges, “which could make searching more difficult in locations.”
In different phrases, even when wolves aren’t consuming giant numbers of elk, their mere presence can change elk habits in some situations. It’s solely by zooming in on sure areas inside a state that these shifts begin to emerge. WGFD wildlife biologist Aly Courtemanch displays among the elk herds in Northwestern Wyoming, the place grey wolves are most plentiful, and she or he says there’s much more nuance to the statewide elk inhabitants improve.
Learn Subsequent: New Utah Study Shows Elk Leave Public Ground During Hunting Season, But Issuing Private-Land Tags Send Them Back
“Wolves are actually solely discovered within the northwestern nook of the state,” Courtemanch tells Out of doors Life. “Most of that improve in [our elk numbers] has occurred on the jap aspect of the state, the place we don’t have wolves, and it’s largely been pushed by issues like land-use change.
“On the Western aspect, there are pockets the place elk have decreased for varied causes, however total these herds have been pretty secure in current a long time,” she continues. “In fact, wolves eat elk. And we all know they have an effect on elk. However we haven’t seen it to such a big extent that it’s driving inhabitants numbers.”
Mills says one of the simplest ways to know the true impacts that wolves are having on elk within the West is thru prolonged analysis. He says there hasn’t been a lot of this finished in Wyoming outdoors of Yellowstone NP, and he factors to a number of research which were performed in Idaho and Montana.

Picture by Evelyn / Adobe Inventory
One such study, performed in Montana’s Bitterroot Vary and printed in 2016, discovered that extra aggressive harvest rules on black bears and wolves didn’t affect elk calf survival or recruitment there. The research additionally famous that mountain lions had been the predators most chargeable for killing elk, as lions killed a median of thrice as many elk as wolves.
One other Montana research that looked at mule deer populations throughout the state drew related conclusions, in response to longtime Montana wolf researcher Diane Boyd, who offered a few of this knowledge in a 2021 wolf information session hosted by CPW. (There are additionally roughly thrice as many mountain lions in Montana as there are wolves, Boyd identified throughout her presentation.)
Boyd additionally stated that as a normal rule, harsh winters kill considerably extra elk than wolves and different predators do. Throughout the brutal winter of 2022-23, for instance, wildlife managers in elements of Northwest Colorado noticed cow elk populations decline by round 60 p.c.
“So, we are able to add up all this knowledge. We are able to speak about mountain lions, and we are able to speak in regards to the impacts of searching — and I’m a hunter. We’ve additionally obtained grizzly bears and black bears,” Boyd defined within the webinar. “However winter, far and away, has the most important vital affect on big-game animal populations.”
Wolves Will Scale back Elk Looking Alternatives in Sure Public-Land Models
A 12-year elk survival study performed by the Idaho Division of Fish and Sport places a finer level on the mixed toll that harsh winters and wolf packs can have on elk. The research was led by IDFG senior analysis biologist Dr. Jon Horne, who joined Boyd in presenting a few of his findings to Colorado wildlife officers in 2021.
The Idaho research tracked 1,200 collared grownup feminine elk and 800 collared 6-month-old elk calves throughout all 29 of the state’s elk administration zones between 2004 and 2016. Horne and the opposite researchers concluded that extra elk had been killed by wolves in areas with marginal winter vary. Unsurprisingly, these impacts had been extra noticeable in areas with bigger wolf packs. Additionally they noticed variability: Wolf predation of elk elevated throughout high-snow years and decreased throughout low-snow years.
All which means elk residing in sure habitats — comparable to areas with deep snow — are extra susceptible to wolf predation throughout extreme winters. Over time, these elk are both killed or they relocate. Sadly for hunters, Courtemanch says which means some elk herds have shifted their distribution from areas the place they had been traditionally discovered throughout searching season.
To reveal these shifts, Horne pointed to 2 charts that confirmed elk populations as they associated to administration targets in all 29 of Idaho’s elk administration zones. These charts confirmed how through the years, the presence of wolves has led to extra items with too many or too few elk.

Charts by IDFG / Dr. John Horne / by way of YouTube
“That is the place lots of the analysis and concern about wolf predation on ungulates comes into play,” Horne stated. “Lots of these zones which are under administration targets are within the backcountry of Idaho. And that’s what Idaho is legendary for, these backcountry elk hunts [for public-land hunters].”
IDFG’s latest elk management plan reveals that wolves are a limiting think about 11 of the state’s 29 elk administration zones, and the elk populations in 4 of these zones are thought of “extremely restricted” by wolf predation. To Horne’s level, these are primarily backcountry areas within the north-central a part of the state. That is the place grey wolves are most plentiful, and the place elk declines have been “precipitous,” in response to IDFG.
“During the last 20 years, some backcountry elk populations declined between 34 and 80 p.c primarily based on elk survey knowledge,” reads the 2014 to 2024 administration plan. “Subsequently, obtainable elk tags have been diminished by as a lot as 52 p.c.”
One of many 4 zones thought of “extremely restricted” by predation, the Lolo zone is a chief instance of a public-land unit the place elk searching alternatives have been diminished since wolves had been introduced again to the state. The Lolo’s elk inhabitants peaked round 16,000 in 1989 and has declined ever since. The newest estimates by IDFG in 2017 confirmed round 2,000 elk there.
“Looking within the [Lolo] zone has been extraordinarily restricted for the reason that late Nineteen Nineties,’” the company defined in a 2020 press release. “Rifle attempting to find bull elk [has been] diminished by half and all cow hunts have been eradicated.”

Picture by kat7213 / Adobe Inventory
These declines within the Lolo have persevered despite the fact that IDFG started taking wolf management actions there in 2011, eradicating a median of 14 wolves yearly from the unit. (That is along with the common of 21 wolves which are taken every year by licensed hunters and trappers, IDFG says.)
Horne cautions towards utilizing the Lolo because the archetypal public-land elk unit. “Elk in Idaho should not created equal,” he instructed CPW officers, “and totally different locations can have totally different experiences.” He says the Lolo has a protracted historical past of elk populations in flux, and that these populations had been already beginning to dip by the mid-90s, when wolves had been introduced again to the realm.
However no matter whether or not wolves (or different predators) could be thought of the principle driver of elk declines within the Lolo, it’s clear that wolves have performed a significant position in stopping these elk from recovering. That’s in response to IDFG biologist Craig White, who was finding out elk and wolves within the Lolo throughout the identical time Horne was conducting the 12-year elk survival research.
In a 2010 article, White defined that between 2005 and 2008, IDFG documented wolves eradicating round 20 p.c of cows every year. He stated throughout that point, elk survival charges had been right down to round 75 p.c with none cow harvest by hunters, in comparison with 89 p.c in the course of the pre-wolf days when hunters might nonetheless take cows.
Learn Subsequent: The Ultimate Guide to Elk Hunting
“Maybe much more alarming is that winter calf survival is just 30 to 52 p.c in areas with comparatively excessive wolf numbers. This compares to calf survival charges of 71 to 89 p.c previous to 2004 when wolf densities had been decrease,” White wrote on the time. “A number of components performed a task on this decline [of elk populations in the Lolo], however at the moment, wolves are the first cause that elk are nonetheless trending down on this zone and can’t get well.”
IDFG spokesperson Roger Phillips says these declines, mixed with the expansion of elk herds in different elements of the state, can result in the misperception amongst hunters that each one the elk are being pushed out of the backcountry and into the entrance nation. That’s not all the time the case, he explains, despite the fact that it’d maintain true for sure herds in some areas.
“Our radio collar knowledge doesn’t again that up,” Phillips tells Out of doors Life. “What he have is speedy development of [elk] herds in these entrance nation and ag areas, and a protracted, regular decline in a few of these backcountry areas. It’s not essentially a migration.”
Wolves Are Not Ecological Saviors, and They Gained’t Resolve CWD
One of the frequent arguments made by wolf-restoration advocates is that wolves are a keystone species that developed alongside elk and different ungulates. And that by preying on ungulate populations, which might in any other case eat themselves out of home and residential, wolves and different predators assist keep steadiness in an ecosystem.
At its core, this argument appears to make sense. Have a look at a metropolis like Montreal or Pittsburgh, the place whitetail numbers are so uncontrolled that tax-funded sharpshooters are culling them, and you may see what occurs when a deer inhabitants exceeds the carrying capability of a given ecosystem. However this line of pondering overlooks the sweeping habitat modifications which have occurred all through North America during the last century and the truth that a big a part of the Decrease 48 is now principally uninhabitable for wolves and different apex predators. It additionally reductions the necessary position that people, one other predator species, play in managing ungulate populations.
Anti-hunting teams just like the Heart for Organic Variety additionally contend that restoring wolves and different apex predators to an space the place they’ve been absent will really enhance the general well being of that ecosystem. For instance, they usually level to the concept of trophic cascades in Yellowstone Nationwide Park — the speculation that bringing again grey wolves has allowed sure woody crops (and favourite elk meals) like aspen timber to get well, thereby bettering the general well being of the panorama.

Picture by Danita Delimont / Adobe Inventory
However this principle has been considerably debunked in recent times. A 2021 study instructed that the reintroduction of grey wolves didn’t trigger as a lot aspen regrowth as as soon as thought. Another study printed in March reached an identical conclusion.
Mills agrees, and he says that among the “observational science” behind the trophic cascades principle isn’t extensively agreed upon. He additionally casts doubt on one other widespread concept that’s been promoted by wolf advocates in Colorado lately: That wolves can assist clear up the CWD problem by having a “cleansing effect” on the state’s contaminated deer and elk herds.
“There isn’t any science to point that CWD goes to be diminished as a result of wolf predation is on the panorama. There will likely be claims that there’s science, however these are modeling workouts primarily based on estimations of wolf predation,” Mills says. “You’re additionally coping with a illness that has a multi-decade persistence within the soil … so I’d say that wolf predation eliminating CWD is unrealistic.”
When pressed by CPW workers in the course of the 2021 webinar, IDFG’s Horne had a blunt response to the query of whether or not wolves can assist eradicate CWD from deer and elk populations: “No.”
Which Is Why Colorado Must Handle Its Wolves within the Future
Whereas advising CPW officers about what to anticipate as wolves reestablish themselves, each Boyd and Horne spoke to how rapidly wolves re-colonized the obtainable habitat in Montana and Idaho. Colorado wildlife managers ought to “count on the sudden,” Boyd stated, and she or he pointed to a 2017 map that confirmed the dispersals of 297 radio-collared wolves from Montana over a 15-year interval.

Map by Diane Boyd / MFWP
“They went to 2 nations, seven states, and two provinces from our core populations [in Montana]. And that’s what you want to learn about wolves,” Boyd stated. “They reside by their toes, because the previous Russian proverb says. You should have wolves going all over the place. And they’re going to present up in locations you aren’t anticipating them.”
Boyd talked about this to emphasise that Colorado wildlife managers could have no selection however to handle wolves as they proceed to disperse. This consists of concerns for deadly administration, she stated, as a result of there will likely be extra conflicts with ranchers and different landowners — these are already happening — and wolves will get killed.
Learn Subsequent: As Wolf Management Debate Reaches a Fever Pitch, the Interior Department Hires a National Mediator
It’s additionally necessary to notice that one of many causes Wyoming, Idaho, and Montana nonetheless have strong elk herds is as a result of they’re capable of handle their very own grey wolf populations. (Grey wolves should not a protected species in these states, however they continue to be federally protected in Midwestern states, the place hunters say wolves are having major impacts on deer populations.) So when state wildlife managers see imbalances in predator-prey dynamics, they will modify accordingly.

Picture by Lori Iverson / USFWS
Mills says that over time, continued administration by state wildlife businesses can assist tackle among the uncertainties round wolves. And he says that in his expertise, Wyoming’s means to handle its grey wolf inhabitants has helped preserve elk populations secure, whereas on the identical time rising the general social tolerance of wolves.
“However for those who don’t handle wolves on the native degree, they usually’re protected below the Endangered Species Act, you don’t get that,” Mills says. “I believe it’s a cautionary story for Colorado, too, as a result of there’s already a powerful push there to by no means hunt wolves. And I believe that’s a dropping recreation in terms of constructing a tolerance for wolves on the panorama.”
Trending Merchandise